{"id":209,"date":"2026-06-23T07:17:27","date_gmt":"2026-06-23T07:17:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/?p=209"},"modified":"2026-07-04T17:21:24","modified_gmt":"2026-07-04T17:21:24","slug":"sanchez-c-francia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/sanchez-c-francia\/","title":{"rendered":"Sanchez c. Francia"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ai_generated_summary":"","wpai_meta_description":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"affected_subject":[74,76,75],"country":[73],"judicial_forum":[71],"relevant_legal_instruments_artic":[68,81,82,83],"rights_involved":[],"thematica_area":[42,43],"class_list":["post-209","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","affected_subject-digital-users-online-communities","affected_subject-general-public","affected_subject-political-opposition","country-france","judicial_forum-european-court-of-human-rights","relevant_legal_instruments_artic-article-10-freedom-of-expression-central","relevant_legal_instruments_artic-article-17-abuse-of-rights-hate-speech-context-contextual","relevant_legal_instruments_artic-article-19-freedom-of-expression-secondary","relevant_legal_instruments_artic-article-202-advocacy-of-hatred-constituting-incitement-contextual","thematica_area-ai_surveillance_digital_rights","thematica_area-freedom_of_expression_media"],"acf":{"observation_unit":["Judicial Decision"],"role_in_the_chilling_effect":"Judicial Response","linked_records":"","country":[73],"geographic_area":["Europe","European Union","Council of Europe Area"],"year":2023,"event_date":"20230515","last_updated":null,"thematic_area":[42,43],"measure_type":["Criminal Proceeding","Criminal Sanction","Restrictive Judicial Decision","Content Moderation or Removal"],"pressure_actor":"Court Judiciary","affected_subjects":[74,76,75],"rights_involved":false,"relevant_legal_instruments_and_articles":[68,81,82,83],"record_status":"Decided","case_outcome":"No Violation Found","outcome_description":"The European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber found no violation of Article 10. It accepted that the applicant\u2019s criminal conviction for failing to promptly delete unlawful third-party comments from his publicly accessible Facebook wall pursued legitimate aims and was based on relevant and sufficient reasons. For the CHILL Barometer, the outcome is restrictive: the judgment confirms that, in certain circumstances, a social media account holder, especially a politician using a public page during an election campaign, may face criminal liability for failure to moderate unlawful comments by others.","judicial_response":"Court Reinforces the Restrictive Measure","judicial_forum":[71],"main_source":"main_source: https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-224928","secondary_sources":"","source_type":[84],"source_reliability":100,"overview":"Sanchez v. France concerns the criminal conviction of Julien Sanchez, a French local councillor and parliamentary candidate, for failing to promptly delete unlawful third-party comments posted on the publicly accessible Facebook wall used for his election campaign. The comments were found by the French courts to amount to incitement to hatred or violence on religious grounds. The European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber held that there had been no violation of Article 10 of the Convention. For the CHILL Atlas, the case is relevant because it confirms a model of shared liability for online speech: a political actor who opens a public social media space may be expected to monitor and remove unlawful comments by others within a reasonable time. Although the judgment is grounded in the legitimate aim of combating hate speech, it may increase chilling pressure on political actors, activists, page administrators and online communities by encouraging preventive moderation, comment disabling or over-removal of controversial speech.","barometer_status":"Complete Assessment","barometer_scope":"Judicial Response Assessment","effect_on_chilling_pressure":"Increases Pressure","chilling_effect_level":"High","measure_intensity":3,"legal_uncertainty":"4","sanctioning_risk":4,"breadth_of_affected_subjects":5,"vulnerability_of_affected_subjects":2,"documented_deterrent_effect":0,"public_visibility_exemplary_effect":4,"replicability_of_the_measure":3,"surveillance_or_data_collection":1,"procedural_safeguards":0,"protective_judicial_response":0,"corrective_or_mitigating_effect":0,"barometer_source_reliability":5,"total_barometer_score":61,"barometer_confidence":"High","barometer_notes":"This assessment treats Sanchez v. France as a restrictive judicial response. The judgment increases chilling pressure because it confirms that a social media account holder, especially a politician using a public page during an election campaign, may be held criminally liable for failing to promptly delete unlawful third-party comments. The strongest indicators are sanctioning risk, legal uncertainty, public visibility and replicability. The score does not include protective indicators, which are set to 0 because the judgment did not limit or annul the restrictive measure. The assessment remains high-confidence as to the legal outcome, but the documented deterrent effect is moderate because direct evidence of actual self-censorship is limited.","presence_of_ai":"Unclear","role_of_ai":[],"automation_level":"Unknown","human_oversight":"Unknown","data_type_used":"Unknown","ai_act_relevance":"Not Assessed","environmental_context":[],"economic_actor_involved":[],"corporate_accountability_connection":["Not Assessed"],"aarhus_convention_connection":["Not Assessed"],"enable_chill_scoring":true,"record_direction":false,"scoring_record_type":false,"case_family_id":"","linked_restrictive_measure":null,"linked_corrective_decision":null,"evidence_confidence":"medium","coercive_severity":0,"protected_activity_nexus":0,"reach_replicability":0,"deterrence_visibility":0,"duration_and_persistence":0,"vulnerability_power_asymmetry":0,"ai__data_opacity":0,"remedy_strength":0,"rights_based_reasoning":0,"generalizability_precedent":0,"implementation_compliance":0,"procedural_safeguards_created":0,"timeliness":0,"watchdog_vulnerable_protection":0,"linkage_multiplier":1,"implementation_multiplier":1,"safeguards_reducing_chilling_pressure":[],"manual_safeguard_deduction":0,"pressure_cap":100,"protection_cap":100,"enable_manual_score_override":false,"chilling_pressure_score_raw":0,"chilling_pressure_score_final":0,"protective_correction_score_raw":0,"effective_protection_score":0,"final_chill_score":0,"final_score_label":false,"score_explanation":"","main_evidence_for_score":"","scoring_uncertainty":false,"scoring_version":"low : Low uncertainty medium : Medium uncertainty high : High uncertainty","last_scoring_review":null},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":423,"href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209\/revisions\/423"}],"acf:term":[{"embeddable":true,"taxonomy":"category","href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/84"},{"embeddable":true,"taxonomy":"judicial_forum","href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/judicial_forum\/71"},{"embeddable":true,"taxonomy":"relevant_legal_instruments_artic","href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/relevant_legal_instruments_artic\/83"},{"embeddable":true,"taxonomy":"relevant_legal_instruments_artic","href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/relevant_legal_instruments_artic\/82"},{"embeddable":true,"taxonomy":"relevant_legal_instruments_artic","href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/relevant_legal_instruments_artic\/81"},{"embeddable":true,"taxonomy":"relevant_legal_instruments_artic","href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/relevant_legal_instruments_artic\/68"},{"embeddable":true,"taxonomy":"affected_subject","href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/affected_subject\/75"},{"embeddable":true,"taxonomy":"affected_subject","href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/affected_subject\/76"},{"embeddable":true,"taxonomy":"affected_subject","href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/affected_subject\/74"},{"embeddable":true,"taxonomy":"thematica_area","href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/thematica_area\/43"},{"embeddable":true,"taxonomy":"thematica_area","href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/thematica_area\/42"},{"embeddable":true,"taxonomy":"country","href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/country\/73"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209"},{"taxonomy":"affected_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/affected_subject?post=209"},{"taxonomy":"country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/country?post=209"},{"taxonomy":"judicial_forum","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/judicial_forum?post=209"},{"taxonomy":"relevant_legal_instruments_artic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/relevant_legal_instruments_artic?post=209"},{"taxonomy":"rights_involved","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rights_involved?post=209"},{"taxonomy":"thematica_area","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chill-lab.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/thematica_area?post=209"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}